Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
21. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Noxisia Arkana wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: The last one is actually a good point, T3Cs should be able to refit themselves for a completely different role. Not including the option where you have a DST following you with ev...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.13 22:01:27
|
22. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Noxisia Arkana wrote: In the focus group we've mentioned that the cargohold for exploration is fairly lackluster; but as you said earlier I don't think we want to infringe on the T2 transports niche. Nothing worse than ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.13 17:16:35
|
23. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Among the Caldari cruisers, only the Navy Caracal, Eagle and Onyx have no drone bays. The Zealot (Amarr), Phobos (Gallente) and B...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.13 02:24:18
|
24. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Frostys Virpio wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: Bronson Hughes wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Among the Caldari cruisers, only the Navy Caracal, Eagle and Onyx have no drone bays. The Zealot (Amarr), Phobos (Gallente) and Broadsword (Minmatar) a...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.12 20:18:01
|
25. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
zbaaca wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: I also find the lack of drones on the caldari missile sub to be a hinderance as well. proposal on that bieng remove 1 launcher, shift 1 high to a low, add 25 bandwidth, 50 bay. caldari and drones... do you...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.12 19:48:11
|
26. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Bronson Hughes wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Among the Caldari cruisers, only the Navy Caracal, Eagle and Onyx have no drone bays. The Zealot (Amarr), Phobos (Gallente) and Broadsword (Minmatar) also lacks drones. Interestingly, literally hal...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.12 19:47:10
|
27. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
NextDarkKnight wrote: So by changing the minerals does that make them somewhat insurable? Depends on how much they get changed.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.10 14:46:50
|
28. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Cargo has always been an issue with T3's, with needing to carry more equipment, a depot, and sufficient ammo, these should all be boosted to the 500-700m3 range. Alternately giving them a deployed mode that simulates the depot and a 300m3 or so mo...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.09 23:25:43
|
29. Sticky:[Summer] RLML and HML balance pass - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Reading all this makes me remember the 325+ page threadnaught over the creation of rapid lights as they exsist today. this Finger Of God effect was predicted when this whole burst idea hit the table. While I'd rather see them brought back to pre-C...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.09 20:16:36
|
30. Sticky:[Summer] RLML and HML balance pass - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
sten mattson wrote: Quote: This would mean that the following ships would have their range bonuses only apply to Heavy and Heavy Assault Missiles: Orthrus, Caracal, Cerberus, Onyx, Osprey Navy Issue, Cyclone, Drake, Drake Navy Issue the ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.09 20:08:47
|
31. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
in regards to all of this ^^^ Escalation nerf for anomalies would be an ok idea, but apply it across the board not just to top grade anomalies. Faction BPC droprate: can't say I run nullsec sites so best I could offer there is to not theorycraf...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.09 17:11:13
|
32. Hey CCP! Can we have an IGB update? - in EVE Technology Lab [original thread]
Max Kolonko wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Max Kolonko wrote: Also i have only one monitor so its kind of touchy subject for me and all overlay browsers ive tried are s#?!t compared to igb. And no, im not going to rearrange my apartament to fi...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2015.12.29 19:37:33
|
33. Sticky:Damage profiles by ship group and weapon type in 2015 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Morrigan LeSante wrote: Any way to split out missiles to size fired? Rapid XXX are probably over-representing, but we can't tell from here. and lights are very good at applied damage whereas heavies are terrible, I'd like to see this too
- by Mhari Dson - at 2015.12.29 17:46:20
|
34. Sticky:Damage profiles by ship group and weapon type in 2015 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I have always wondered why the reliance on drones for just about every ship to take out small stuff when a second fitting line (for small weapons only) would accomplish the job without the extra server side load drones produce.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2015.12.29 17:31:13
|
35. Sticky:Dev Blog: Exploring The Character Bazaar & Skill Trading - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
What I see happening with a system like is described in the blog is a sudden blast of 100's of 3.3m SP gank pilots that go to -10 sec status then get biomassed. Counterproposal: Instead of an instant reward of SP, make it a 2x training speed til ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2015.10.29 12:40:10
|
36. Where are the T3 Frigates and Battle Cruisers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
we really need the exsisting T3's rebalanced before the dessys get released in their gimped format.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2014.11.05 09:33:20
|
37. New industry skills discussion (connected to Advanced Industry) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Still need more science slots, multi-run is nice but falls far short.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2014.11.05 09:27:34
|
38. Sticky:Dev blog: Coming in Oceanus on September 30th - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DeMichael Crimson wrote: For the past couple of years majority of expansions / releases are mostly Bug Fixes and Window Dressing mixed with a little bit of content. Basically a lot of Icing being placed on very little Cake. Too much Eye-Candy i...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2014.09.13 04:32:00
|
39. Sticky:Dev blog: Coming in Oceanus on September 30th - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Phantom wrote: CP Seagull comes with exciting news and a high level overview of the Oceanus release which is going to be published on September 30th: EVE Online in French New cloaking effect Improved wormhole nebula Improved ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2014.09.12 18:15:00
|
40. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
yay, another summit where nullsec gets to W/B/M/C and nothing gets done for anybody. Can we break this cycle finally so hisec can get some dev time?
- by Mhari Dson - at 2014.09.11 22:07:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |